Should a public university, funded by taxpayers, be able to censor controversial speech on campus? According to the University of Calgary, the answer to this question is a resounding “yes.” In spite of its stated mission to “seek truth and disseminate knowledge,” and in spite of advertising itself as “a place of education and scholarly inquiry,” the University of Calgary has charged some of its own students with “trespassing” because they set up a pro-life display on their own campus this past November.
People have varying life perspectives – sharing those perspectives enables progress. It doesn’t matter if you agree with the message or not, cutting it off only contributes to ignorance.
The fact the University of Calgary has allowed other controversial displays to go on raises questions about their motives in this particular case:
Moreover, the university has expressed no qualms about other controversial large colour displays, including ones showing the effects of torture on political dissidents in China, the cruelty of animal testing and the consequences of spousal abuse. It seems gory and disturbing displays on campus are fine–as long as they do not convey a politically incorrect view on abortion.
A publicly funded educational institution getting involved in a public debate is one thing – and that’s another question altogether that we can leave for another time. But, assuming it’s perfectly acceptable for them to participate in the debate, is there anything that can justify silencing the other side?
If nothing else university should be the one place where it is allowed to have unpopular opinions. I advocate total free-speech everywhere, but the one place where it is most important to guard it is university.
-
If I had to vote I’d keep things the way they are, but it bothers me to hear that free expression is being curtailed. It is our most important freedom.
Thanks for your comment, Fraser. I’m always interested to hear what people have to say on this topic. And I agree with you completely.