<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daniel Keyes &#187; Human Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielkeyes.ca/journal/tag/human-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielkeyes.ca/journal</link>
	<description>Communication is my specialty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Human Rights Tribunal Really Need to Get Involved?</title>
		<link>http://danielkeyes.ca/journal/2009/02/10/does-the-human-rights-tribunal-really-need-to-get-involved/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=does-the-human-rights-tribunal-really-need-to-get-involved</link>
		<comments>http://danielkeyes.ca/journal/2009/02/10/does-the-human-rights-tribunal-really-need-to-get-involved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Keyes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.keyes.ca/journal/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when two personal freedoms conflict?  [Ted] Kindos owns Gator Ted&#8217;s Tap &#38; Grill in Burlington. Four years ago, he asked a marijuana smoker to step away from his front door. The medically licensed toker complained to the Ontario &#8230; <a href="http://danielkeyes.ca/journal/2009/02/10/does-the-human-rights-tribunal-really-need-to-get-involved/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when two personal freedoms conflict? </p>
<blockquote><p>[Ted] Kindos owns Gator Ted&#8217;s Tap &amp; Grill in Burlington. Four years ago, he asked a marijuana smoker to step away from his front door.</p>
<p>The medically licensed toker complained to the Ontario Human Rights Commission of bias against a disabled person. He won.</p>
<p>Kindos was about to pay the fine and post obligatory signs saying, &#8220;We accommodate medicinal marijuana smokers,&#8221; when a different government agency told him he could lose his liquor licence. Serving anybody possessing a controlled substance – prescribed or not – is against the law.</p></blockquote>
<p><a title="Eatery's liquor licence in jeopardy after toker wins rights decision" href="http://www.thestar.com/article/585012">Full Story</a></p>
<p>Medicinal marijuana smokers certainly have a right to access their medicine, free of discrimination (you can even argue that <em>anyone</em> should have a right to do <em>anything</em> to their own bodies as long as it doesn&#8217;t infringe on anyone else&#8217;s rights – but there are laws preventing that). But shouldn&#8217;t people also have a right to protect the well-being of their business? Would the toker be any worse off if he had simply moved a few meters away from the entrance, away from the families that regularly passed through? Apparently a compromise wasn&#8217;t good enough.</p>
<blockquote><p>After spending $40,000 to fight the rights complaint – the government covered [the smoker, Steve] Gibson&#8217;s costs – Kindos announced last May he would settle. But on seeing the offer, he changed his mind. He was ordered to pay Gibson $2,000 for pain and suffering, train staff in the human rights code, educate the public about the code, and post the signs.</p>
<p>Discovering he could lose his licence proved the last straw.</p>
<p>Kindos must continue to fight the complaint or lose his business, he says. Legal bills could also bankrupt him but a lawyer has agreed to take the next stage without charge.</p></blockquote>
<p>All this because the Ontario Human Rights Commission got involved in a situation that could have easily been worked out between two individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danielkeyes.ca/journal/2009/02/10/does-the-human-rights-tribunal-really-need-to-get-involved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

